Clinical findings from 104 cases of calving paralysis in dairy cows from Gippsland, Australia.

Case History: Dairy cows recumbent following calving on farms in South Gippsland, Australia were examined during two 3-month seasonal calving periods in 2011 and 2012 as part of a larger study of 218 recumbent cows. A cohort of 104 cows diagnosed with calving paralysis following dystocia was derived from the larger group, which were examined with 3 days of becoming recumbent. A thorough medical and musculoskeletal clinical examination was performed on each cow including flexor-withdrawal and patellar reflex tests, and postural assessment in the lifted position, unless the facilities were not available. Cows were diagnosed with one or more neurological syndromes: sciatic, tibial paresis, obturator or femoral, based on clinical findings consistent with damage to these peripheral nerves or their nerve roots. Clinical Findings: Evidence of sciatic syndrome was found in 100/104 (96.2%) cows and 146/172 (84.9%) affected hind limbs either as the sole neuropathy or in combination with tibial paresis, obturator or femoral syndromes. Pelvic damage was also present in 3/104 (2.8%) cows. Obturator syndrome was diagnosed in 30/104 (29%) cows and 45/172 (26.2%) affected hind limbs but not apparently as the sole reason for the recumbency. Femoral syndrome occurred in 16/104 (15.4%) cows and 21/172 (12.2%) affected hind limbs and was the only syndrome recorded in one cow. Clinical Relevance: Sciatic syndrome was the most common neurological syndrome observed in cows with calving paralysis. The other major nerves arising from the lumbo-sacral plexus were also affected and the various syndromes associated with damage to these nerves or their ventral nerve roots occurred in many combinations. Calving paralysis should be thought of as a paresis or paralysis resulting from damage to the ventral nerve roots of the lumbo-sacral plexus as any of the nerves originating from this plexus can be damaged during dystocia either individually or in combination with other nerves from the plexus.

High-quality care improves outcome in recumbent dairy cattle.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of the quality of care on outcome and occurrence of secondary damage in recumbent dairy cows. METHODS: Recumbent dairy cows were monitored during their recumbency under field conditions in South Gippsland, Victoria, Australia. The cause of the original recumbency of 218 downer cows was determined and any secondary damage, day 7 status, final outcome and the nursing conditions of the cows were recorded. A four-tiered grading system describing nursing quality was developed to allow analysis of its influence on outcome and on the occurrence of secondary damage. RESULTS: Day 7 outcome, final outcome and occurrence of important secondary damage were very strongly associated with the level of overall care provided to the recumbent cows. There was a decrease in the percentage of cows recovering by day 7 from 33% to 0%, a decrease from 45% to 0% of cows eventually recovering and an increase from 68% to 100% of cows with clinically important secondary damage as overall care decreased. CONCLUSION: Management of recumbent cattle is potentially a significant animal welfare issue for the dairy industry and their care is a very important but often under-appreciated aspect of their management. Recovery is positively influenced by high-quality care by improving the chances of recovery from the initial cause of recumbency and by reducing the occurrence of secondary damage. Recumbent cows must either be nursed at a high level of care or euthanased promptly.

Importance of secondary damage in downer cows.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relative importance in downer cows of the primary cause of recumbency in comparison with secondary complications. METHODS: Downer dairy cows were monitored during their recumbency under field conditions in South Gippsland, Victoria, Australia. The cause of the original recumbency of the 218 cows was determined and secondary damage, status on day 7 and final outcome were recorded. RESULTS: Some type of secondary damage was found in 183/218 (84%) cows, of which 173/218 (79%) had damage deemed to be clinically important. By day 7, 52 (24%) had recovered and 69 (32%) eventually recovered. Of the 149 (68%) cows that were euthanased or died, 23 (15%) were deemed to have been lost solely from the primary cause, 107 (72%) from secondary damage and 19 (13%) from a combination of both. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in recovery among the five broad groups of causes of primary recumbency. Secondary damage was very common and presented in a large variety of ways, with many cows having multiple types of secondary damage concurrently. For most cows the secondary damage was more important than the initial primary damage in determining their fate.